Yes, Israel has a right to exist

My American guest asked me; if I believe that Israeli nation has the right to exist or not.  Yes, Israeli nation has the right to exist.

 

!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Amazed?!!!!!    Any way this amazement will vanish when you read my explanation..

 

Every people and every nation has the complete right to live freely and peacefully without harming others. That's the way I believe.

 

So, if we considered the Israeli nation which existed for long centuries before my birth, your birth and before the birth of all people on earth now, is a nation like any other nation, taking into consideration the lawful fact that the difference between nation and people or state is the element of authority, and asked ourselves if they have the right to exist or not, then, we can reply by another question; Are Israelis(Jews) human beings or not?!!

 

Now, my respond is clear; Jews who are sons of Israel(Jacob) are human beings, and only for that fact they have the complete right to live and exist. As a result; this Israeli nation has the right to exist.

 

BUT if were going to talk about Israeli state which has been declared in 1948, so, it's completely different. I won't say directly what I think about the right of Israeli state to exist, but firstly there are more important views than mine to Israeli state and its right to exist..

 

In the preamble of UN charter; you can read this as a general obligation on UN peoples;  '..to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours ..',  You can also read following in the  2nd article of UN charter;  'All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, ...'

 

So, what can we extract from these texts?!!!  Every people is obligated to live together in peace with its neighbours, and to be good neighbours!!!  Let me think for a moment;  Live in peace!! Good neighbours!!      As a good neighbour I help my neighbours in their troubles, share them in their happiness and sadness, exchange advice, greet them, visit them when they become ill, not to spy on them, ..etc. And if I'm not going to do all that, then the least thing which I have to do is that not to harm them and to steal their belongings, right?!!

So, how a people can be a good neighbour?!!!  Help other peoples in their troubles, share their happiness and sadness, exchange knowledge, not to spy on it.. . Yes, that's right. And if this people isn't going to do any of that, then the least thing to do is not to harm other peoples and not to steal what these peoples own.  It's an ethical obligation before being an obligation out of law.

 

As for the 2nd article it sets an obligation on states not to use any kind of force or even threat of using it in their relations together against  territorial integrity or political independence of any other state!!!  The obligation is so clear!!!  No state can use force against territorial integrity or political independence of other states to achieve any of its purposes.

 

Regarding to these texts, the declaration of the state  Israel is against international law!!!!!

 

Israeli people wasn't the good neighbour to Palestinian people, in contrary it stole its land without having a reasonable reason that justifies stealing Palestinian lands from their people and random killing.  On the other hand, Israel clearly used force against integrity of Palestinian land (Declaration of a state on another state represents the most grave threat to integrity of this state!!!)

As for the 2nd part of the article '..political independence..'  Israel deleted and destroyed political independence of Palestine. Actually; after there were an independent state called 'Palestine ', this state has been deleted!!!!  And another state has been declared instead on this state!!!

 

Yes, Jews(Israelis) had a purpose which was their unity on one land under one state, after oppression committed against them during WWII, and even before that for long centuries. They gathered and discussed about the good area that will be their state, one of the choices was Uganda but they refused it. Then Balfour Declaration has been made to establish national home for Jews in Palestine !!!!!!! And 1948 came by the birth of this state on Palestinian lands,, 'Israel'. A nd since then there is continues extension for the sake of Israeli state against Palestinian land.

The right of Jews to unit must be respected and even to be supported, but if this right opposed with rights of other peoples living in peace, independently and under an established and situated authority, then, the right of this people must be respected firstly.

 

If we're going to talk about humanical law, then we'll fill thousands of long papers.

Israel daily break the humanical rule which obligates not to attack children and babies. Israel daily break the huanical law which obligates not to attack women and old men. Israel daily break humanical rule which obligates not to attack armless people. Israel daily break the humanical rule which obligates not to attack civilians. Israel daily break the humanical law which obligates not to target civil homes and destroy habitation apartments.

 

So, what can be a good solution?!!!!

I recommend a solution. Why don't Israelis declare their own state on a land where there is no people and where there is no independent state?!!!  Do you know where this kind of land can be found?!!! No people, No independent state?!!!! .....  Antarctica.

Illogical, right?!!!!

So, is it logical to accept killing and killing and killing of babies like Eman Hajjo (4 months old) in 5-1-2001, Sarah (1.5 years old) in 1-10-2001, children like Mohammad Al-Dorra (12 years) 30-9-2001, old men like ( Ahmad Yaseen) and civilians (don't need here any example as the world knows the daily and continues random killing) ?!!!!  Is it logical to accept daily destructive of civil homes and targeting civil targets?!!!!  Is it logical to accept creating more and more orphans and more and more widows every day passes in Palestine?!!!   Is it logical to accept displacing people from their homes?!!!  Is it logical to accept frightening safe people?!!!

 

So, if the first solution is illogical, and the second is illogical at all too, what is the solution then?!!!!

 

51st article of UN charter gave us the solution; 'Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations..'

So, it's the right of Palestinian people to defend himself and his land the same like the right of self-defence which any people have and can practice against invaders. And this resistance must last till the Palestinian state which existed before 1948 be declared, and violence be rejected, and real peace prevails, and rights be got back to their owners, and war criminals be provided to international neutral courts.

 

I believe that, any solutions to the Palestinian issue won't do any thing, because all will be temporary and won't last. So,there must be a permanent solution which depends firstly on respecting international law and punishing criminals and getting back rights to their owners.  And without that; you'll see a hundred Qana, and a hundred Deir Yassen, and the problem won't be solved. If the group of the four requires; rejecting violence, respecting previous deals, confession by Israel and ending resistance, so I think that they aren't targeting the good solution, but the good solution must depends on following basics;

• Israeli state is against international law; preamble of UN charter, 2nd article of UN charter.
• Israeli state is an invader land.
• Israeli daily deeds against armless Palestinian people is against humanical and international law.
• The right of Jews to unit must not harm others rights.
• Self-defence against killing innocents and stealing lands represents an admitted and legal right.
• If it's not good to decrease Israeli state, so was it good to delete Palestinian state?!!

Was my view rational?!!

 

 

All visitors of this blog are welcomed to discuss this issue, but please;

1.       Reviles aren't welcomed at all, only objective discussion.

2.       Circular and philosophical discussions aren't welcomed, but direct points are recommended.

Plz, define terrorism

My guest 'The Loop Garoo Kid' thinks that terrorism is so easy to be defined and he quoted its definition from American Heritage Dictionary, I oppose him and think that there is not a real definition for this word, especially by American administration, which made itself a 'Fighter against terrorism'.  For that reason; I'm publishing this post to show my point of view about 'Terrorism definition'.

 

If American Heritage Dictionary know what 'Terrorism' means, then America itself don't.

As you quoted the definition from this dictionary, then, let us see; "The use of terror , violence, and intimidation to achieve an end". 

In last Lebanese-Israeli war; Israel did that; Killing hundreds of children, their mothers, their fathers, their grandparents, destroying their homes, destroying infrastructure, targeting civilian positions, using F16's, using internationally prohibited weapons, ....and all of that against armless civilians.. hmmmmm.. Let me think for a moment!!!! Killing!! Destroying!! Banned weapons!!!!!!!  Against civilians!!!!    Can this be put under the word 'terror', or 'violence' or 'intimidation' ?!!!!!  What do you think?!!!   I think that this isn't only violence, terror and intimidation, but it's barbarism, aggressive, massacres.       '..to achieve an end'  Israel aimed at revenging not putting an end.    So I ask here; did we hear that  THIS (only a 4 letters word that sums up the whole war between Lebanon and Israel by all its consequences) has been described by American administration as 'Terrorism' or at least 'A bad thing'?!!!!!!   Sorry, but I didn't hear that.

 

There is also many other examples to prove that American administration don't know what terrorism means; I mean many massacres that Israel committed against children, women or civilians and not a word from America that it's terrorism; like attacking  Baher Al Baqar school in Egypt killing 30 children in 8 April 1970,  Deir Yassin massacre in 9 April 1948 when 250 of children, women, old men, old women, villagers have been killed,  Qana in 18 April 1996  where 106 civilian have been killed (Notice here that America used its Veto to stop any condemn to this massacre) , Qana in 30 July 2006 where 55 civilians have been killed including 27 children and majority of women ....  and many many other massacres when Israeli war machine has been directed towards civilians and civil targets, and no re-action 'against' but only 'support' from American administration to these massacres.

 

Even in the war against Lebanon; instead of calling to stop the war; American administration vaunt to the world and said; 'It's not the good time to stop fire',  by another word; 'It's not the good time to stop killing children and targeting civil targets' .  In addition; it sent 'smart rockets' to Israel to use to kill civilians and destroy civil targets!!!

 

And if terrorism is so easy to be defined as you say, so why Iran to have nuclear technology is terrorism, and Israel and America to own nuclear bombs are .... are .. ar... (Did any body talk about that?!!! Or it's illegal?!!!!)

 

So, if American administration don't consider killing civil Lebanese and Palestinian babies and Egyptian students as terrorism, so what is terrorism for it?!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

So, I can say it; America didn't define what terrorism is yet, however it made itself 'Terrorism fighter'.  BUT, I can tell you what is the definition of terrorism for American administration; it's 'A word which can be used to describe those who are against American interests around the world, and to justify killing and destroying and declaring wars against third-world countries, and to gain the sympathy of your people.   It's not an objective measure, but a measure which is very flexible in hands of those who use it to fit their desires, and to justify evil, and to turn random killing and breaking international law into a noble task'.

 

By the way; both those whom America call terrorists (and they are really killers and butchers to kill innocents e.g 9-11), and also Americans are killing without any restriction. Look at 9-11, and look at American air fighters attacking Somalia; just two examples for random killing and infringement to international and humanical law. So, if both are committing the same crime by different justification; but lead to the same result which is killing innocents and destroying their homes.   So, the question is; what is the difference?!!!

 

And a last thing; I still don't believe that Al- Qaeda had the first hand in terrible 9-11 attacks.